Understand how consumers bucket restaurants based on a variety of experience drivers and sentiment.

We all know that consumers think about some restaurants in similar ways.  If you want a burger, you’ll go to a burger joint.  And if you want a salad, you’ll go somewhere that makes good salads.  But what if we want to understand how consumers bucket restaurants based on a variety of experience drivers and sentiment?


The HundredX data science team maintains proprietary models to identify associations among restaurant brands based on a suite of HundredX data from consumers.

These models answer questions such as:

  • Do consumers view McDonald’s similarly to Burger King? How about Chipotle or Dominos? If so, how?
  • How does Taco Bell compare to a company from another industry like Nike in terms of brand and diversity?
  • Do people think Del Taco is like Company X, which was off Del Taco's radar? Why? 
  • How does Shake Shack approach or surpass a competitor in a key driver? 


In exploring the question of consumers’ mental restaurant associations, we ran a model to cluster Quick, Fast, Casual competitors based on consumer drivers.  In the process of doing so, we identified a variety of interesting and unexpected results.  One of these compelling associations is the fact that consumers view Sweetgreen, a restaurant chain that serves salads, similarly to Pinkberry, a frozen yogurt chain.  While these restaurants target different consumer needs (meal vs dessert), they are aligned with a common outcomes-based value proposition within consumers’ minds. 


Understanding the relationships between brands like Sweetgreen and Pinkberry in the minds of consumers opens up many possibilities.  The two companies could explore partnerships such as co-locations in select markets.  There is also an interesting case for exploring M&A between the restaurants or similar chains.  Other restaurants could look at the value propositions of each brand to target acquisition of customers who match the profile of Sweetgreen / Pinkberry customers.  These are just a few of many possibilities, and the, and the strategic implications are significant and widely applicable.


This analysis is based on HundredX's proprietary data, developed from consumer feedback collected through the HundredX Causes Program. Nothing in the HundredX data constitutes professional or investment advice on the part of HundredX.

Strategy Made Smarter


HundredX works with a variety of companies and their investors to answer some of the most important strategy questions in business:

  • Where are customers "migrating"?
  • What are they saying they will use more of in the next 12 months?
  • What are the key drivers of their purchase decisions and financial outcomes?


Current clients see immediate benefits across multiple areas including strategy, finance, operations, pricing, investing, and marketing.


Our insights enable business leaders to define and identify specific drivers and decisions enabling them to grow their market share.


Please contact our team to learn more about which businesses across 75 industries are best positioned with customers and the decisions you can make to grow your brand’s market share.

Share This Article

06 May, 2024
Sure, lattes, mochaccinos, and cappuccinos are pricey, but they taste delicious. For many consumers, the great taste of coffee shop coffee made it worth the cost. But customers at Starbucks aren't so sure the tradeoff is worth it anymore. Examining more than 420,000 pieces of feedback across the Quick, Fast, Casual (QFC) industry, including over 21,000 on Starbucks, we find: Starbuck's Purchase Intent 1,2 is down 3% over the past six months, with most of that dip occurring over the past few months. By contrast, Dunkin' Donuts has remained within a tight range over the past six months, as did an average of other, smaller coffee chains. Customers increasingly see less value in Starbucks. Starbuck's Value perception 3 fell 5% over the past six months, compared to just 1% for Dunkin' Donuts. However, it also fell 5% for the average of the smaller coffee chains. Coffee drinkers feel significantly unhappier about Starbuck's quality and taste. Starbuck's Taste perception fell 4% over the past six months, while rising 1% for competitors. Likewise, its Quality perception dipped 3% over the same time period (and 8% over the year). Ultimately, Starbuck's perceived drop in taste is leading inflation-weary consumers to say they plan to spend less at the coffee chain, as the value just isn't as good.
06 May, 2024
Forbes Best Brands for Social Impact, Powered by HundredX
06 May, 2024
Ozempic once dominated the headlines, but GLP-1 competitor Mounjaro is winning over customers. GLP-1 drugs, used for treating diabetes and aiding in weight loss, are relatively new on the market yet have surged in popularity over the last year. They're becoming so popular that J.P. Morgan estimates that 30 million people in the US may be using a GLP-1 drug by 2030. This statistic presents a significant potential for early drug creator Novo Nordisk (Ozempic, Wegovy), and perhaps an even bigger one for Eli Lilly (Mounjaro, Zepbound). HundredX data indicates Eli Lilly is in a position to win over Novo Nordisk as Mounjaro's Usage Intent widens against the competition. Ozempic may have name recognition, but customers feel more positively about Mounjaro's effectiveness and lifestyle impact, even if they aren't excited about its high price. Examining 1,500 pieces of customer feedback across Mounjaro, Ozempic, and Wegovy, we find: GLP-1 users increasingly say they plan to use Mounjaro more, and Ozempic less . Mounjaro’s Usage Intent is up 19% since July, Wegovy’s is up 3%, and Ozempic has stayed within a tight range. Customers feel Mounjaro is more effective than competing drugs, but it’s harder to get . Mounjaro outperforms other GLP-1 drugs in effectiveness, lifestyle impact, and side effects. However, customers dislike its cost and availably more than competitors.
Share by: