Home Fitness Experiences a Massive Bump During COVID


The ‘Home Fitness’ industry experienced a massive bump in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic as many gyms & fitness centers were forced to shut their doors. Peloton was a big winner last year when the company saw its stock price increase by over 400% in 2020.1 Another winner during the Covid lockdown was Mirror, which was purchased in June of 2020 by Lululemon for over $500 million.


Although 2020 proved to be a successful year for companies in the ‘Home Fitness’ space, 2021 has been a bit rockier. The rollout of the COVID vaccines, which allowed gyms & fitness centers to reopen, combined with a general public eagerness to socialize slowed the momentum for ‘Home Fitness’ related spending. The results of the shift in consumer fitness trends has had a significant impact on companies in the ‘Home Fitness’ industry. For example, Lululemon recently lowered revenue estimates for their Mirror product to the range of $125 - $130 million, down from earlier estimates that ranged from $250 - $275 million. Their CEO, Calvin McDonald, even admitted to investors that “2021 has been a challenging year for digital fitness.”3


HundredX Home Fitness Industry Future Purchase/Usage Intent (Trailing 3 Months)

The rollercoaster type year for the industry was captured within data collected at HundredX. Below is a graph showing the purchase/usage intent delta for the ‘Home Fitness’ industry since the start of the year. The industry began to witness a slight decline after vaccines rolled out beginning in March, then a slight uptick in the months leading up to summer. However, the industry has seen a steep decline since July, indicating momentum from 2020 might have finally run out of steam.


Results for Key Home Fitness Leader - Peloton


Peloton has seen a significant drop in its stock price over the past few months, falling by as much as 76% since the start of 2021. The company recently lowered their revenue and earnings guidance for FY2022 in a letter to shareholders. 4


Purchase/Usage Intent


According to HundredX data, consumers rank Peloton as the top ‘Home Fitness’ company in both NPS & Consumer Satisfaction. While the company continues to be best in class, it is not immune to the industry-wide shift from at-home to in-person fitness. In fact, the company has seen its purchase/usage intent decline at a faster rate compared to the rest of the industry in recent months.

Drivers

Peloton is seen as the best in the industry across 6 of its 7 most popular ‘consumer drivers’. Consumers view the company’s price as the largest drawback. Peloton stated in their most recent quarterly report that “price remains a barrier to purchase for many consumers and this is our latest step to improve the accessibility of our platform.”


Customer Migration

Consumers that plan to spend/use more or about the same.

Consumers that plan to spend/use less.

HundredX looked at consumers from the last year (12/1/20 - 11/30/21) that indicated they would use Peloton more, less, or about the same over the next twelve months. Customers who plan to use Peloton more or about the same indicate that the company’s superiority in Technology, Class Options, Instructors, Quality, Equipment, and Design (indicated above left) drives their interest. However, for customers who plan to use Peloton less, price remains the biggest deterrent.


  1. Washington Post: The pandemic's home-workout revolution may be here to stay
  2. WSJ: Lululemon Buys Mirror, an At-Home Fitness Startup, for $500 Million
  3. Business Insider: Lululemon spent $500 million on high-tech fitness startup Mirror but the deal is losing its shine, analysts say
  4. Peloton Investor Relations: Q1 2022 Shareholder Letter


This analysis is based on HundredX's proprietary data, developed from consumer feedback collected through the HundredX Causes Program.

Nothing in  the HundredX data constitutes professional or investment advice on the part of HundredX.

Strategy Made Smarter


HundredX works with a variety of companies and their investors to answer some of the most important strategy questions in business:

  • Where are customers "migrating"?
  • What are they saying they will use more of in the next 12 months?
  • What are the key drivers of their purchase decisions and financial outcomes?


Current clients see immediate benefits across multiple areas including strategy, finance, operations, pricing, investing, and marketing.


Our insights enable business leaders to define and identify specific drivers and decisions enabling them to grow their market share.


Please contact our team to learn more about which businesses across 75 industries are best positioned with customers and the decisions you can make to grow your brand’s market share.

Share This Article

06 May, 2024
Sure, lattes, mochaccinos, and cappuccinos are pricey, but they taste delicious. For many consumers, the great taste of coffee shop coffee made it worth the cost. But customers at Starbucks aren't so sure the tradeoff is worth it anymore. Examining more than 420,000 pieces of feedback across the Quick, Fast, Casual (QFC) industry, including over 21,000 on Starbucks, we find: Starbuck's Purchase Intent 1,2 is down 3% over the past six months, with most of that dip occurring over the past few months. By contrast, Dunkin' Donuts has remained within a tight range over the past six months, as did an average of other, smaller coffee chains. Customers increasingly see less value in Starbucks. Starbuck's Value perception 3 fell 5% over the past six months, compared to just 1% for Dunkin' Donuts. However, it also fell 5% for the average of the smaller coffee chains. Coffee drinkers feel significantly unhappier about Starbuck's quality and taste. Starbuck's Taste perception fell 4% over the past six months, while rising 1% for competitors. Likewise, its Quality perception dipped 3% over the same time period (and 8% over the year). Ultimately, Starbuck's perceived drop in taste is leading inflation-weary consumers to say they plan to spend less at the coffee chain, as the value just isn't as good.
06 May, 2024
Forbes Best Brands for Social Impact, Powered by HundredX
06 May, 2024
Ozempic once dominated the headlines, but GLP-1 competitor Mounjaro is winning over customers. GLP-1 drugs, used for treating diabetes and aiding in weight loss, are relatively new on the market yet have surged in popularity over the last year. They're becoming so popular that J.P. Morgan estimates that 30 million people in the US may be using a GLP-1 drug by 2030. This statistic presents a significant potential for early drug creator Novo Nordisk (Ozempic, Wegovy), and perhaps an even bigger one for Eli Lilly (Mounjaro, Zepbound). HundredX data indicates Eli Lilly is in a position to win over Novo Nordisk as Mounjaro's Usage Intent widens against the competition. Ozempic may have name recognition, but customers feel more positively about Mounjaro's effectiveness and lifestyle impact, even if they aren't excited about its high price. Examining 1,500 pieces of customer feedback across Mounjaro, Ozempic, and Wegovy, we find: GLP-1 users increasingly say they plan to use Mounjaro more, and Ozempic less . Mounjaro’s Usage Intent is up 19% since July, Wegovy’s is up 3%, and Ozempic has stayed within a tight range. Customers feel Mounjaro is more effective than competing drugs, but it’s harder to get . Mounjaro outperforms other GLP-1 drugs in effectiveness, lifestyle impact, and side effects. However, customers dislike its cost and availably more than competitors.
Share by: