As consumers adapt to evolving economic realities, the anticipated merger of grocery giants Kroger and Albertsons¹ provides a potentially pivotal opportunity for shoppers. Both companies have shown resilience with their customers in these challenging times, but there's a chance now to leverage each other's strengths to deliver an improved customer experience as a combined company. 



By analyzing 170,000 pieces of feedback from “The Crowd” of real grocery shoppers over the last year, we find:


  • If they leverage each other’s strengths and enhance Albertsons’ digital services, such as online ordering and delivery (a Kroger’s strength) and improve Kroger’s checkout efficiency (an Albertsons’ strength), they can better meet customer expectations in these important areas. This would enhance competitiveness in a landscape increasingly influenced by e-commerce giants.
  • This strategic fusion could provide the scale to offset potential price hikes that worry some customers and better position the new entity to compete with e-commerce giants. 

Potential benefits from sharing online ordering and checkout best practices

An area ripe for synergy is online ordering and delivery. Over the course of the last year, Kroger’s average customer sentiment²,³ in this area outstripped Albertsons’, hovering around 17% versus Albertsons and its subsidiaries’ average of 7% and the industry average of 12%. Grocery shoppers like Kroger’s online ordering and delivery more than its competitors’. Currently, grocery shoppers view Walmart and Target’s online ordering and delivery better than Kroger’s, but the grocery chain is making changes that could also be deployed across the acquired Albertsons’ brands. 

Kroger has made several strategic moves to create a more seamless online shopping experience for its customers, including opening new fulfillment centers across several states and expanding data science and AI capabilities to offer customers a more personalized experience. “It’s great Kroger is offering home delivery to my house now,” one customer told HundredX last year, shortly after Kroger began offering expanded delivery services in Florida, Texas, and Alabama. 


Albertsons, meanwhile, has started opening micro-fulfillment centers. By incorporating Kroger's established and efficient online infrastructure and new fulfillment and delivery centers, a merged Kroger and Albertsons stands to enhance its digital customer experience drastically and widen its delivery reach, better equipping them to stand against e-commerce adversaries



The proposed merger could also help Kroger and Albertsons better its checkout process. After price, speed/checkout is the second most selected reason why grocery shoppers like or dislike a grocery brand. 


Albertsons and its subsidiaries perform fairly well compared to competitors with the speed of its checkout process. 

Albertsons customer sentiment towards speed/checkout is just under that of the average grocery store but well ahead of Kroger. Albertsons and its subsidiaries recently saw a 3% increase in customer sentiment towards speed/checkout since February. Albertsons-branded stores and some of its subsidiaries brought back self-checkout lanes a few years ago after abandoning them in 2011 for a more personal approach. The Albertsons brand partnered with Toshiba for the shift, which has apparently proved popular enough for Albertsons to trial a store in Boise last year that only featured self-checkout lanes. 



While grocery shoppers have mixed feelings on self-checkout lanes, with some longing for employee help, many others are glad Albertsons is bringing back them back. 


“I loved that they put self-checkout at Albertsons at my store because they make it so much easier for you to check out,” a customer told HundredX in December. 


For its part, Kroger has also been rolling out new automatic rolling self-checkout lanes across some of its locations. Still, it may want to take a page from Albertsons’ book as the two companies come together. 

Merger could actually result in lower prices, not higher ones as many fear

A combined supply chain and negotiating leverage could also help Kroger and Albertsons prices. 

As we saw in , the grocery industry already struggles with lower price sentiment compared to that of superstores and e-commerce. While Kroger does better than Albertsons and its subsidiaries on price sentiment, both lag the industry average, and are far behind Walmart Grocery and discount grocery chain Aldi. 


Better supply chain infrastructure could help the companies cut costs, as could eliminating some digital overhead. The sheer number of stores the merged companies would operate, in the thousands, could also give the brands increased negotiation power with food vendors. Walmart has long used this tactic to offer its customers relatively cheap groceries. 


By strategically merging their individual strengths and addressing weaknesses, Kroger and Albertsons can forge a powerhouse capable of better contesting with e-commerce leaders. This is an opportunity for transformation – a chance to redefine standards and set a new pace in the grocery industry. 


  1. We’re showing Albertsons as a weighted average of the major Albertsons brands that we follow: ACME Markets, Albertsons, Hannaford, Jewel-Osco, Market Street, Randalls, Safeway, Shaw's, Stop & Shop, Tom Thumb, United Supermarkets, and Vons.
  2. All metrics presented, including Net Purchase Intent (Purchase Intent), and Net Positive Percent / Sentiment are presented on a trailing three-month basis unless otherwise noted. 
  3. HundredX measures sentiment towards a driver of customer satisfaction as Net Positive Percent (NPP), which is the percentage of customers who view a factor as a positive (reason they liked the products, people, or experiences) minus the percentage who see the same factor as a negative. 

Strategy Made Smarter


HundredX works with a variety of companies and their investors to answer some of the most important strategy questions in business:

  • Where are customers "migrating"?
  • What are they saying they will use more of in the next 12 months?
  • What are the key drivers of their purchase decisions and financial outcomes?


Current clients see immediate benefits across multiple areas including strategy, finance, operations, pricing, investing, and marketing.


Our insights enable business leaders to define and identify specific drivers and decisions enabling them to grow their market share.


Please contact our team to learn more about which businesses across 75 industries are best positioned with customers and the decisions you can make to grow your brand’s market share.

####


HundredX is a mission-based data and insights provider. HundredX does not make investment recommendations. However, we believe in the wisdom of the crowd to inform the outlook for businesses and industries. For more info on specific drivers of customer satisfaction, other companies within 75+ other industries we cover, or if you'd like to learn more about using Data for Good, please reach out: https://hundredx.com/contact.

Share This Article

06 May, 2024
Sure, lattes, mochaccinos, and cappuccinos are pricey, but they taste delicious. For many consumers, the great taste of coffee shop coffee made it worth the cost. But customers at Starbucks aren't so sure the tradeoff is worth it anymore. Examining more than 420,000 pieces of feedback across the Quick, Fast, Casual (QFC) industry, including over 21,000 on Starbucks, we find: Starbuck's Purchase Intent 1,2 is down 3% over the past six months, with most of that dip occurring over the past few months. By contrast, Dunkin' Donuts has remained within a tight range over the past six months, as did an average of other, smaller coffee chains. Customers increasingly see less value in Starbucks. Starbuck's Value perception 3 fell 5% over the past six months, compared to just 1% for Dunkin' Donuts. However, it also fell 5% for the average of the smaller coffee chains. Coffee drinkers feel significantly unhappier about Starbuck's quality and taste. Starbuck's Taste perception fell 4% over the past six months, while rising 1% for competitors. Likewise, its Quality perception dipped 3% over the same time period (and 8% over the year). Ultimately, Starbuck's perceived drop in taste is leading inflation-weary consumers to say they plan to spend less at the coffee chain, as the value just isn't as good.
06 May, 2024
Forbes Best Brands for Social Impact, Powered by HundredX
06 May, 2024
Ozempic once dominated the headlines, but GLP-1 competitor Mounjaro is winning over customers. GLP-1 drugs, used for treating diabetes and aiding in weight loss, are relatively new on the market yet have surged in popularity over the last year. They're becoming so popular that J.P. Morgan estimates that 30 million people in the US may be using a GLP-1 drug by 2030. This statistic presents a significant potential for early drug creator Novo Nordisk (Ozempic, Wegovy), and perhaps an even bigger one for Eli Lilly (Mounjaro, Zepbound). HundredX data indicates Eli Lilly is in a position to win over Novo Nordisk as Mounjaro's Usage Intent widens against the competition. Ozempic may have name recognition, but customers feel more positively about Mounjaro's effectiveness and lifestyle impact, even if they aren't excited about its high price. Examining 1,500 pieces of customer feedback across Mounjaro, Ozempic, and Wegovy, we find: GLP-1 users increasingly say they plan to use Mounjaro more, and Ozempic less . Mounjaro’s Usage Intent is up 19% since July, Wegovy’s is up 3%, and Ozempic has stayed within a tight range. Customers feel Mounjaro is more effective than competing drugs, but it’s harder to get . Mounjaro outperforms other GLP-1 drugs in effectiveness, lifestyle impact, and side effects. However, customers dislike its cost and availably more than competitors.
Share by: