The meal kit delivery industry is enjoying a rise in Loyalty Intent as it taps into the desires of young adults and lower-income households for diverse, affordable, and delicious meal options. With an emphasis on convenience, these services cater to the unique needs of these demographics, who are increasingly saying they will keep using meal kits to get fresh, easy-to-prepare meals that fit within their busy lives and budgets.


We explore the factors that have captured the attention of 18-29-year-olds and low-income households and how we believe their preferences should help to shape the meal kit delivery landscape. We also highlight the strategic actions of various meal kit delivery companies that are driving their success in this competitive market.


After analyzing 900,000 pieces of feedback across five food-related sectors, including more than 20,000 pieces of feedback across 26 meal kit delivery brands, we find:


  • Intent to Eat¹,² for the meal kit delivery industry increased by 3% over the past three months, even as it stayed stable for other food-related sectors.
  • The growth in Intent to Eat for meal kit delivery is predominantly driven by young adults and lower-income households.
  • It appears Hello Fresh's significant investment in its social media presence is paying off, with it leading all meal kit platforms in Loyalty Intent with 18–29-year-olds.
  • Amazon Meal Kits has seen a major increase in Loyalty Intent recently, driven by its surge in customer sentiment³ towards its healthy options, quality, and service and support. 


“The Crowd” of real food industry customers says that the growth in people planning to keep eating meal kits is outpacing other food industries. While meal kit Loyalty Intent increased 3% over the last three months, Purchase Intent for other food-related sectors remains stable.

Healthy eating, convenience, and social media movements driving meal kit popularity

The increased importance of health, wellness and convenience, especially among young adults, is driving Loyalty Intent increases for meal kits. The upcoming warm weather, and the subsequent talk about slimming down to have that perfect “beach body,” may play a role, too. 


For a few years now, health influencers on social media, particularly TikTok and Instagram, have been popular with young adults. Some meal kit companies have been smart to notice and invest.


The TikTok accounts of Blue Apron and HelloFresh, two of the most popular meal kit service providers, have hundreds of thousands of views each. Videos tagged with #BlueApron have more than 15 million views on TikTok, and videos tagged with #HelloFresh have more than 300 million views. 


“Great customer service and marketing techniques with the company,” a HelloFresh customer told HundredX. 


HelloFresh in particular has a well-documented history of working with social media influencers and offers influencers an easy way to submit a partnership bid on its website. HundredX feedback providers, including those between 18-29, have left the most feedback on HelloFresh compared to other meal kit brands. 


These trends collectively have made Loyalty Intent highest among 18–29-year-olds for all meal kit delivery services, not just leader HelloFresh. Since December, Loyalty Intent surged for customers between 18 and 29, rising 8% -- significantly higher than the 3% average increase across all ages.

It’s possible the high Loyalty Intent among young adults aged 18-29 can be linked to their busy lifestyles and the desire for easy-to-prepare and nutritious meals. Customers in this age group are likely in college or early in their careers and may have less time to dedicate to meal planning and preparation. Meal kit delivery services offer a convenient solution, providing pre-portioned ingredients and step-by-step instructions to create delicious, well-balanced meals. 

Similarly, Loyalty Intent for meal kits both rising the most and is the highest among the lowest-income households – those making less than $25K per year, followed by those making $25K-$50K -- highlights the value these services provide. As lower age and income levels are often related, it's no surprise that young adults and lower-income households both have strong Loyalty Intent. Meal kit delivery services are more affordable than dining out, making them an attractive choice for those on a budget. 



It’s worth noting, however, that customers’ sentiment toward the price of meal kit services is lower than in every other food-related industry except food delivery.

Recent Trends and Winners

Several meal kit companies have performed exceptionally well over the past three months. Loyalty Intent rose 10% for Amazon Fresh Meal Kits, 8% for Green Chef, 8% for Blue Apron, and 7% for HelloFresh. This suggests that these companies are successfully catering to the needs and preferences of their target audience. Meal kit customers of all ages and incomes have felt increasingly happy about the healthy options offered by meal kit brands, as well as their packaging and taste. Sentiment towards these factors rose 7% since December for all meal kit services.

We note Loyalty Intent not only rose the most for Amazon Fresh Meal Kits, but is also the highest by far, at 48%. Having lots of healthy options appears to be a major reason for Amazon’s surge, with sentiment towards healthy options increasing 9% since December and 19% over the past year. Other reasons highlighted by The Crowd include Amazon’s personalization (sentiment is +13% since December), service and support (+11%), order accuracy (+8%) and quality (+7%). 


Among its competitors, Amazon Meal Kits are the only ones that customers can have delivered within two hours of ordering. They don’t require a subscription and are ordered completely through the Amazon website. 


“Amazon Fresh Meal Kits are a great alternative to cooking a meal. Everything comes ready for you to warm up and serve,” one person told HundredX. 


Another person said, “It's convenient and as fresh as it can be being packaged and delivered to my house. There's a variety of menu options and healthy choices. It's fast prep and easy to follow recipes. Tastes good, too.”


As meal kit delivery services continue to grow in popularity, we can expect to see further innovation and increased competition in the market. Brands looking to win should focus on expanding their breadth of healthy options, investing in taste and speed while remaining price competitive to appeal to a broader range of consumers, including young adults and lower-income households.


Stay tuned for future insights on movements in consumer preferences and brand strategies in the meal kit delivery industry. 

All metrics presented, including Net Loyalty Intent (Loyalty Intent), and Net Positive Percent / Sentiment are presented on a trailing three-month basis unless otherwise noted. 


  1. Intent to Eat reflects a way to compare the future intentions of customers across various food-related industries. It captures:
  2. Loyalty Intent for Meal Kit Delivery Services, which is the percentage of customers who plan to keep using the service minus the percentage who intend to cancel. It also captures Visit Intent for Groceries, Usage Intent for Food Delivery, and Purchase Intent for the dining industries, which all represent the percentage of customers who expect to visit, use or spend more on a brand minus those who intend to visit, use or spend less.
  3. HundredX measures sentiment towards a driver of customer satisfaction as Net Positive Percent (NPP), which is the percentage of customers who view a factor as a positive (reason they liked the products, people, or experiences) minus the percentage who see the same factor as a negative.

Strategy Made Smarter


HundredX works with a variety of companies and their investors to answer some of the most important strategy questions in business:

  • Where are customers "migrating"?
  • What are they saying they will use more of in the next 12 months?
  • What are the key drivers of their purchase decisions and financial outcomes?


Current clients see immediate benefits across multiple areas including strategy, finance, operations, pricing, investing, and marketing.


Our insights enable business leaders to define and identify specific drivers and decisions enabling them to grow their market share.


Please contact our team to learn more about which businesses across 75 industries are best positioned with customers and the decisions you can make to grow your brand’s market share.

####


HundredX is a mission-based data and insights provider. HundredX does not make investment recommendations. However, we believe in the wisdom of the crowd to inform the outlook for businesses and industries. For more info on specific drivers of customer satisfaction, other companies within 75+ other industries we cover, or if you'd like to learn more about using Data for Good, please reach out: https://hundredx.com/contact.

Share This Article

06 May, 2024
Sure, lattes, mochaccinos, and cappuccinos are pricey, but they taste delicious. For many consumers, the great taste of coffee shop coffee made it worth the cost. But customers at Starbucks aren't so sure the tradeoff is worth it anymore. Examining more than 420,000 pieces of feedback across the Quick, Fast, Casual (QFC) industry, including over 21,000 on Starbucks, we find: Starbuck's Purchase Intent 1,2 is down 3% over the past six months, with most of that dip occurring over the past few months. By contrast, Dunkin' Donuts has remained within a tight range over the past six months, as did an average of other, smaller coffee chains. Customers increasingly see less value in Starbucks. Starbuck's Value perception 3 fell 5% over the past six months, compared to just 1% for Dunkin' Donuts. However, it also fell 5% for the average of the smaller coffee chains. Coffee drinkers feel significantly unhappier about Starbuck's quality and taste. Starbuck's Taste perception fell 4% over the past six months, while rising 1% for competitors. Likewise, its Quality perception dipped 3% over the same time period (and 8% over the year). Ultimately, Starbuck's perceived drop in taste is leading inflation-weary consumers to say they plan to spend less at the coffee chain, as the value just isn't as good.
06 May, 2024
Forbes Best Brands for Social Impact, Powered by HundredX
06 May, 2024
Ozempic once dominated the headlines, but GLP-1 competitor Mounjaro is winning over customers. GLP-1 drugs, used for treating diabetes and aiding in weight loss, are relatively new on the market yet have surged in popularity over the last year. They're becoming so popular that J.P. Morgan estimates that 30 million people in the US may be using a GLP-1 drug by 2030. This statistic presents a significant potential for early drug creator Novo Nordisk (Ozempic, Wegovy), and perhaps an even bigger one for Eli Lilly (Mounjaro, Zepbound). HundredX data indicates Eli Lilly is in a position to win over Novo Nordisk as Mounjaro's Usage Intent widens against the competition. Ozempic may have name recognition, but customers feel more positively about Mounjaro's effectiveness and lifestyle impact, even if they aren't excited about its high price. Examining 1,500 pieces of customer feedback across Mounjaro, Ozempic, and Wegovy, we find: GLP-1 users increasingly say they plan to use Mounjaro more, and Ozempic less . Mounjaro’s Usage Intent is up 19% since July, Wegovy’s is up 3%, and Ozempic has stayed within a tight range. Customers feel Mounjaro is more effective than competing drugs, but it’s harder to get . Mounjaro outperforms other GLP-1 drugs in effectiveness, lifestyle impact, and side effects. However, customers dislike its cost and availably more than competitors.
Share by: